Sunday, February 28, 2016

To Blog or Not? Is that the Question? (Module 4)

The second part of the most recent EDUC 8306 assignment was to reflect on the challenges and benefits of  my blogging experience. After some thought, I have decided that my biggest challenges include keeping up the momentum of writing the blog entries and composing formal assignments to post in a medium that is more informal.

On the other side, the benefits for me in this assignment so far has been writing for a wider audience and the experience of blogging on a regular schedule.
However, I am unsure which would outweigh the other if I was doing a blog on my own. 

Sunday, February 21, 2016

Twitter in My Toolbox (Module 4)

My older daughter tweets all of time by retweeting interesting information and resources in her field of wildfire management. Even though she doesn’t create her own tweets, people follow her from many countries besides the U.S., such as Canada, Australia, and England. Her curation and aggregation of these resources has become valuable to her and others. I would like to introduce the power of Twitter to the students in my university/community college basic writing courses by adding it to my teaching and learning toolbox.

Since 2006, Twitter, a social networking site, has provided a microblogging service (Kassens, 2014). Increasingly, scholars have shown that Twitter can enhance and support college teaching and learning (Andrade, Castro, Ferreira, 2012; Forgie, S. E., Duff, J. P., & Ross, 2013; Kassens, 2014; Ricoy & Feliz, 2016; Veletsianos, 2012). After reading theses scholars, I see that I might use Twitter to share resources and facilitate writing practice in my basic writing courses. How and why I would do this comes next.  

At first, I would provide Tweets consisting of resources and announcements for students to read. Such Tweets would include credible information sources for students to use during the research unit. I would also provide supplemental resources for readings used in class (Forgie, Duff, & Ross, 2013). For example, when we read an essay by Kent Haruf, a Colorado author, I would Tweet the link to a Washington Post article written by one of his former students. After the students felt comfortable accessing and reading Tweets, I would move to having them Tweet or Retweet resources that they find online. Writing practice would come next. I would like to have my students use Twitter to summarize resources. For example, each student would choose a resource to read and summarize, and then tweet the summary to the whole class.

The benefits of using Twitter in this way for these students are twofold. First, the whole class would know about a variety of resources, and seconds, students would be practicing their writing skills in an authentic setting. The challenges of this technology are also twofold. First, the technology would be new to most of my students, as indicated by an informal poll of them; and second, the technology would be new to me, so my learning curve would be steep.

Using Twitter would increase student engagement. By engagement, I mean “interactions with faculty . . . with peers” (Pascarella & Terenzini; Kuh as cited in Junco, Heiberger, & Loken, 2010) both inside and outside the classroom. Through Twitter, students would be interacting with peers and faculty between class meetings (McArthur, & Bostedo-Conway, 2012). By using Twitter, students and instructors would be able to continue class-time discussion outside of the scheduled session (Junco, Heibergen, & Loken, 2011; Kassens, 2014). Not only can microblogging improve student-to-student interaction, thus creating a learning community (Ricoy & Feliz, 2016), but it can also enlarge the classroom to become part of a larger community built around shared interests and activities (Kassens, 2014).

Thus, Twitter would be a good addition to my toolbox for 21st century skills, but I most likely won’t start using it until Fall 2016 as I am focusing on teaching and learning with D2L this semester. I’ll let you know how Twitter works at the end of 2016.

References
Andrade, A., Castro, C., & Ferreira, S. A. (2012). Cognitive communication 2.0 in higher education: to tweet or not to tweet? Electronic Journal of E-Learning10(3), 293-305. Retrieved from www.ejel.org/

Forgie, S. E., Duff, J. P., & Ross, S. (2013). Twelve tips for using Twitter as a learning tool in medical education. Medical Teacher, 35, 8-14. Retrieved from www.medicalteacher.org/

Junco, R., Heiberger, G. and Loken, E. (2010). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387. 

Kassens, A. L. (2014). Tweeting your way to improved #Writing, #Reflection, and #Community. Journal of Economic Education, 45(2), 101-109. doi:10.1080/00220485.2014.889937

Ricoy, M., & Feliz, T. (2016). Twitter as a learning community in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 237-248. Retrieved from www.ifets.info/

McArthur, J. A., & Bostedo-Conway, K. (2012). Exploring the relationship between student-instructor interaction on Twitter and student perceptions of teacher behaviors. International Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education24(3), 286-292. Retrieved from www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/

Veletsianos, G. (2012). Higher education scholars' participation and practices on Twitter. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning28(4), 336-349. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00449.x

Friday, February 5, 2016

Technology outside the Classroom (Module 3)

For this blog entry, I will focus on technology that can be used outside the classroom at my institution. Frankly, any technology that can be accessed by the internet is available to my students and me. Also available to us through the institution are the learning management system Desire 2 Learn (D2L); Microsoft 365, a suite of productivity software; and One Drive, a file hosting service in the cloud (formerly known as Microsoft Office Live; Denton, 2012). In addition, students and I have available our personal mobile hardware -- smartphones, tablets, laptops.—all of which I encourage students to use. According to a simple classroom poll, all of my students have at least a portable computer or smartphone.

Some of the applications and software I currently use are Microsoft Office Word and Outlook email, parts of D2L, Wikipedia, wikis, and YouTube. I would like to learn other applications in Microsoft such as Access and Excel. I would also like to learn how to use OneDrive. Since the university’s IT department does not offer workshops, the professional development opportunities available to me are two-fold. First, I can ask the administrative office technology instructor for help; second, I can watch Microsoft Office tutorials. Even though those tutorials have been around for some time, I have not used them; however, taking Walden’s “Effective College Teaching: Using Technology to Support Learning” course has spurred my interest in drawing upon that training. Regardless, I would like to see the university provide regular training on Microsoft products.

I believe that expanding my range of computer skills will add to the effectiveness and efficiency of my classroom life.   

References
Denton, D. (2012). Enhancing instruction through constructivism, cooperative learning, and cloud computing. Techtrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 56(4), 34-41. doi:10.1007/s11528-012-0585-1
Educause. (2011). 7 things you should know about organizing files in the cloud. http://www.educause.edu/library/resources/7-things-you-should-know-about-organizing-files-cloud

Friday, January 22, 2016

Panopto Lecture Capture & Video Content Management System (Module 1)

The hardware technologies available in the general purpose classrooms at my institution are a desk top computer running Windows, a document camera, a data projector/screen, amplifiers/speakers, a document camera, and a lecture capture and video content management system (Panopto). The internet and software technologies are MS Office, the internet, and the learning management system (D2L). I am comfortable with all of these except Panopto.

The roll-out for Panopto on my campus was last year, Fall 2015. As of yet, IT has not provided any face-to-face professional development opportunities. However, IT has posted detailed directions on the use of Panopto (20 pages!), which if I have trouble following, I can ask that department for assistance. In addition, IT has listed supplemental resources outside of the college. These resources are from Panopto (n.d.), which also has a YouTube channel (Panopto, n.d.) showing videos such as “An Overview of Panopto” and “How Faculty Use Panopto at SUNY-Lake Oswego .

Others have added videos about Panopto on YouTube, such as “How to View a Recording” (Panopto Tester, 2011) and “How to Record a Voiceover PowerPoint or Keynote using Panopto” (2013). In addition, Newton, Tucker, Dawson, and Currie’s (2014) article on using lecture capture in higher education explains how to get started using lecture capture and provides recommendations for possible problems.

Even more resources are available on Educause, such as “Effective Use of Lecture Capture: Lessons from a Large Lecture Hall Course Project” (Garwood & Linardopoulos, 2015). After reading about all the wonderful ways to use Panopto, I would like to see the college’s IT department provide face-to-face instructional sessions to more fully support classroom technology.

References

Garwood, S., & Linardopoulos. (2015). Effective use of lecture capture in a large lecture hall course.  Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/sites/default/files/library/presentations/ELI15OL/OL04/ELI%2B2015_S%2BGarwood_N_Linard_Effec_Use_of_Lec_Capture.pdf

How to record a voiceover PowerPoint or Keynote using Panopto. (2013). Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apsSoE4K9mY

Newton, G., Tucker, T., Dawson, J., & Currie, E. (2014). Use of lecture capture in higher education - lessons from the trenches. Techtrends: Linking Research & Practice To Improve Learning, 58(2), 32-45. doi:10.1007/s11528-014-0735-8

Panopto. (n.d.). Panopto video.  Retrieved from  https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXkLmJVRtt3MwoOYMw_kWjg


Panopto Tester. (2011). How to View a Recording.  Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apsSoE4K9mY


Monday, January 18, 2016

Annotating Digital Text

Smekens Educational Solutions recently provided a list of tools for annotating digital text (see link below). Some are free, some cost, some are licenses for whole classes.
Apps:
  • Notabiltiy has tools to annotate, clip, record, sketch, and more ($)
  • Skitch allows annotations with arrows, icons, shapes, and text; marks and labels photographs (Free)
  • Subtext integrates 21st Century Skills and makes thinking visible. Teachers can embed discussion, polls, questions, videos, and weblinks. ($3/per student licensed)

Web 2.0 Tools:
  • Curriculet: A tool to promote close reading
  • Actively Learn: Annotate directly in its virtual margins
  • Clearly: Remove ads from webpage margins to make space for annotations. 
http://www.smekenseducation.com/top-tools--for-annotating-digital-text.html

Sunday, January 3, 2016

Welcome to Tech Savvy!

I'm Susan J. Konantz from western Colorado where I teach developmental reading and composition at a combined community college/university. 

I have started this blog as an assignment for EDUC 8306 a Walden University. Its purpose is to write about new and emerging technologies, analyzing and evaluating their potential for use in higher education. I am especially interested in their application for enhancing teaching and learning in face-to-face classrooms, in particular small classrooms with 10-24 students. To that end, I will include descriptions of my experiences in teaching with technology.  

By the end of this course, I hope to be able to  
1. Apply technology and instructional strategies to support and assess student learning and development of critical knowledge and skills
2. Apply communication and collaboration skills to online learning communities
3. Analyze implementation, integration, and sustainability strategies for technologies that support student learning 
4. Analyze opportunities for positive social change as they relate to technology
5. Evaluate technologies for supporting student learning